Offices: Mumbai · Dubai · South Koreainfo@miprasteel.com+91 88022 22222WhatsAppSince 2011

Inconel 600 vs Inconel 690

Comparison

Quick Answer

Inconel 690 has about 29% chromium against about 15.5% in Inconel 600. Iron is similar, around 8–9%, and neither carries molybdenum or niobium. One XRF chromium reading separates them.

Summary

Inconel 690 was developed as a higher-chromium alternative to 600 for service where 600 suffers stress-corrosion cracking, most notably steam generator tubing. The two can look alike as tube and bar.

Because chromium is the only big difference, a single XRF reading is enough. Material from nuclear plant needs its own clearance documents before it can be traded at all. See Inconel 690 scrap and nuclear industry scrap.

Side by Side

Inconel 600Inconel 690
ChromiumAbout 15.5%About 29%
IronAbout 8%About 9%
Key XRF markerChromium near 15%Chromium near 29%
Typical serviceFurnace parts, caustic evaporatorsSteam generator tubes, nitric acid equipment
Common scrap formsPipe, plate, sheetTube, tube sheet offcuts, bar

Composition Compared

Nominal compositions compared element by element. Change either grade to compare others.

On the XRF

Switch the grade to see how the fingerprint changes. See how XRF sorts nickel alloys.

FAQ

What is the main difference between Inconel 600 and Inconel 690?

Inconel 690 has about 29% chromium against about 15.5% in Inconel 600. Iron is similar, around 8–9%, and neither carries molybdenum or niobium.

Can Inconel 600 and Inconel 690 scrap be mixed?

No. Keep them separate. A melter buying either one needs its chemistry to stay within the grade’s limits, and mixing can mean a re-sort or a different valuation.

Chat on WhatsApp